USPTO serial 78062464
IGEOPHYSICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 30, 2003
- Examiner
- BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IGEOPHYSICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID A WEINSTEIN
160O BROADWAYSTE 2600DENVER, CO 80202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | WEB-BASED COMPUTER SOFTWARE PLATFORM FOR ELECTRONIC MANAGEMENT OF GEOPHYSICAL DATA, NAMELY, VALIDATION, EXPLORATION AND VISUALIZATION OF GEOPHYSICAL DATA USED IN THE OIL AND GAS INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
| 042 | WEB-BASED CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE UPSTREAM OIL AND GAS BUSINESS IN THE TECHNICAL FIELD OF GEOPHYSICS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 9, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2003 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 6, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |