Drawing for REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PARTNERS

USPTO serial 78062490

REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PARTNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REPUBLICAN PRESIDENTIAL PARTNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan B. Flohr

SUSAN B FLOHR LALOS & KEEGAN1146 19TH ST NW5TH FLWASHINGTON, DC 20036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Political fund raising servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 14, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 14, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 17, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 7, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 26, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 10, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Oct 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 12, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 4, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance