USPTO serial 78062517
RED HOT, COOL & GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RED HOT, COOL & GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher J. Heinze
CHRISTOPHER J HEINZE BETHEL & ASSOCIATES PA336 N ROBERT ST STE 1600SAINT PAUL, MN 55101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | distribution of hot and chilled water for hot water space heating and chilled water space cooling utilizing renewable (green) energy | ACTIVE | May 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 28, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2005 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |