Drawing for VIDEOLOCK

USPTO serial 78062727

VIDEOLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VIDEOLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE H. SALES

BRUCE H SALES LERNER DAVID LITTENBERG ET AL600 S AVE W STE 300WESTFIELD, NJ 07090-1404UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE FOR SECURE UPLOADING AND DOWNLOADING OF MUSIC, AUDIO, STILL AND VIDEO IMAGES, AND MULTI-MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT TO OR FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR SUBSCRIBER-BASED COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND FOR PROTECTION OF SUCH CONTENT FROM UNAUTHORIZED COPYING, DOWNLOAD THROUGH PLAYBACK AND OTHER MEDIA PIRACYACTIVE—
042APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER FOR SECURE UPLOADING AND DOWNLOADING OF AUDIO, STILL AND VIDEO IMAGES, AND MULTI-MEDIA ENTERTAINMENT CONTENT TO OR FROM A GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK OR SUBSCRIBER-BASED COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORK AND FOR PROTECTION OF SUCH CONTENT FROM UNAUTHORIZED COPYING, DOWNLOAD THROUGH PLAYBACK AND OTHER MEDIA PIRACYACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 25, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 28, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 29, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance