USPTO serial 78062751
PULSAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PULSAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hants. PO9 2NL, GB
Hants. PO9 2NL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert M. Bain
ROBERT M BAIN SENNIGER POWERS LEAVITT & ROEDEL1 METROPOLITAN SQ FL 16ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2733UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines to deposit by a high vacuum sputtering technique a thin layer of material sputtered from a target on a substrate, in the field of precision film deposition; precision thin film deposition machines to deposit a thin layer of material sputtered from a target on an optically transparent substrate, in the field of precision film deposition; machines to build multi-layer optical filters, in the field of precision film deposition; machines to build gain flattening, add/drop multiplexers, in the field of precision film deposition; machines to build multi-dielectric narrow band optical filters for dense wavelength division multiplexing applications, in the field of precision film deposition; vacuum pumps for use in apparatus for vacuum deposition of optical coatings on substrates, parts for all the aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | Scientific apparatus incorporating a vacuum chamber for use in vacuum deposition of an optical coating on a substrate using a vacuum sputtering technique; electronic apparatus to generate and control a gas plasma in the manufacture by vacuum deposition of devices incorporating an optical coating; electronic apparatus, namely laser optical monitors for use in the manufacture by vacuum deposition of multi-layer filters; positive ion beam generators to operate under vacuum plasma generating conditions and to generate a positive ion beam or beams, being parts of vacuum sputtering apparatus; scientific apparatus to bombard a target with ions from a broad beam ion source to eject material from the target; computers and computer programs to control a vacuum sputtering process in the production of optical networking components; electric current neutralizers for neutralizing ion beams from ion beam sources in vacuum sputtering apparatus; electronic power supplies; gas metering devices, namely, gas meters and gas gauges for use in vacuum sputtering apparatus during deposition of optical coatings on substrates; vacuum measurement devices, namely vacuum gauges for use in vacuum sputtering apparatus for use in vacuum deposition of optical coatings on a substrate; and parts for all the aforementioned goods | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 20, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 22, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |