Drawing for PLATINUM SERIES

USPTO serial 78062961

PLATINUM SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLATINUM SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MICHAEL R. REINEMANN

MICHAEL R REINEMANN CESARI AND MCKENNA, LLP88 BLACK FALCON AVENEBOSTON, MA 02210-2414UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011fixed installation air conditioner and heat pump systems for manufactured housingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 25, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 28, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 21, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 14, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 10, 2007ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 11, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 15, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 26, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 16, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 12, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Aug 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 4, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 2, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 26, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 7, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 7, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 27, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 3, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2002GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2002ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance