USPTO serial 78063543
FULL FLAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FULL FLAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Frankfurt am Main
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RA Stefan Zdarsky
GREG PEARCE FULL FLAME LLC2400 SAND LAKE RDSTE 777ORLANDA, FL 32809Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video cassettes featuring and instructional materials on Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine; compact discs featuring Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine; prerecorded magnetic data carriers featuring Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine; pre-recorded laser-data carriers featuring Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 1998 |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely a series of non-fictional books on Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine; periodicals on Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine; newspaper on Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine and printed instructional, educational and teaching materials on Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine; photographs | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 1998 |
| 041 | Education service, namely courses at university level, correspondence courses in the field of Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine; educational services, namely conducting seminars in the field of Christian evangelization and the Christian doctrine | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 1998 |
| 042 | Association services, namely, promoting the interests of missionary work and evangelization throughout the world | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Full Flame GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FULL FLAME
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 28, 2003 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 18, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |