USPTO serial 78063600
GAMECHANGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GASKINS, TONJA M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GAMECHANGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kim Muller
KIM MULLER SHELL PETROLEUM INC910 LOUISIANA STHOUSTON, TX 77002-4916UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS MARKETING SERVICES, NAMELY RESEARCH ANALYSIS AND ADVICE IN THE AREA OF INNOVATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, NAMELY RESEARCH, ANALYSIS AND ADVICE IN THE AREA OF INNOVATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY; BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONAL CONSULTATION SERVICES, NAMELY CONSULTATION ON ORGANIZATIONAL; DESIGN AND ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS UTILIZING INNOVATION | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY CONDUCTING CLASSES AND WORKSHOPS IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY; TRAINING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INNOVATION AND INNOVATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | DESIGN SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGNING CORPORATE PROCESSES FOR INNOVATION AND INNOVATION STRATEGY, AND DESIGNING AND FACILITATING INNOVATION WORKSHOPS ; TECHNOLOGY EXCHANGE CONSULTANCY SERVICES, NAMELY ATTRACTING AND PURCHASING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, TECHNOLOGY OR TECHNOLOGICAL KNOW-HOW, AND ATTRACTING PARTNERS FOR JOINT VENTURES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 20, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 21, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |