USPTO serial 78063627
ACCUTEL PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2004
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ACCUTEL PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
Etobicoke, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Laubscher, Jr.
LAWRENCE E LAUBSCHER JR LAUBSCHER & LAUBSCHER1160 SPA RD STE 2BANNAPOLIS, MD 21403-1099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | providing video and audio Internet conferencing services; providing operator assisted conference call services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELL CANADA
- Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ACCUTEL CONFERENCING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named ACCUTEL PLUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 8, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 11, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |