USPTO serial 78063759
SACER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SACER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Washington,, DC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunication services; electronic communications services; multimedia services; Internet service provider services; online service provider services; electronic commerce services; mobile commerce services; network services; call forwarding services; telecommunications services, namely, the mobile wireless electronic transmission of voice, data, paging and facsimiles; mobile wireless electronic voice messaging services; recording, storage, and subsequent wireless transmission of voice messages from and to mobile wireless telephones; providing wireless telecommunications carriers located outside of North America access to the North American cellular network; intercarrier billing services; telecommunications network clearing house services; telecommunications network financial settlement services; satellite transmission services; radio broadcasting services; wireless communication services; paging services; wireless digital messaging services; telephone calling card services; pre-paid telephone calling card services; facsimile services; digital messaging services; radio broadcasting services; electronic voice messaging services; electronic voicemail services; consulting services in the field of telecommunication, wireless, digital, and cellular telephone services and all types of wireless communication services; technical consultation services; hardware and software consulting services; educational services; broadcast and entertainment services; access services to global computer information networks, on-line services and bulletin boards; providing an interactive data base and access to an interactive computer data base in the fields of weather, sports, health, financial information, hobbies, news, education, recreation, transportation, nature, self-improvement, government affairs, home management, literature, shopping, international affairs, travel, style, and business and local information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |