USPTO serial 78064011
REDEFINING DINING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDEFINING DINING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
North Miami, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason I. Hewitt
JASON I HEWITT BOX TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE RESTAURANT SERVICES OF OTHERS THROUGH INCENTIVE REWARD AND LOYALTY PROGRAMS AND ON-LINE PROMOTIONS FEATURING RESTAURANT-RELATED BENEFITS, RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, AND PROVIDING MERCHANT INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF RESTAURANT MANAGEMENT AND PROMOTION SERVICES VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, MASS MEDIA, AND MAIL | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | ELECTRONIC FINANCIAL TRANSACTION PROCESSING FOR PROGRAM MEMBERS AND PARTICIPATING MERCHANTS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | PROVIDING RESTAURANT INFORMATION AND RESTAURANT RESERVATION SERVICES VIA THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK, MASS MEDIA, AND MAIL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Oct 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | LOAP | LETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |