USPTO serial 78064048
BAMBOO FOREST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BAMBOO FOREST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST
LEIGH ANN LINDQUIST SUGHRUE, MION, ZINN, MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Essential oil blend for personal use, essential oils for use in the manufacture of scented products and cosmetics, non-medicated bath salts, body and skin lotions, bath and body oils, shower gels, shampoos and conditioners, hair oils and hair care preparations, namely, creams and ointments, body care butters, lip balm, massage oils, personal body mists, colognes, room fragrances, toilet water | ACTIVE | May 20, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |