Drawing for PHYS.SCI.

USPTO serial 78064986

PHYS.SCI.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PHYS.SCI.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

W. Mack Webner

W MACK WEBNER SUGHRUE MION PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Eyewear, namely, eyeglasses, eyeglass cases, sunglasses, spectacles, goggles for use in skiing, snowboarding, swimming, bicycling and motorcycling, replacement lenses, ear stems, nose pieces and foam stripsACTIVE—
014Jewelry and timepieces.ACTIVE—
018Luggage and all-purpose sports bagsACTIVE—
028Sporting goods, namely, skateboards, snowboards, surfboards, inline skates and their component parts; toys, namely action figures and figurines.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 26, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 26, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 10, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 21, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 6, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 6, 2003GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 8, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 27, 2002TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 23, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance