Drawing for BRAND WARFARE

USPTO serial 78065720

BRAND WARFARE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KELLY, JOHN M
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRAND WARFARE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles E. Weinstein, Esq.

CHARLES E WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLPWORLD TRADE CTR W155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Board gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 3, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 22, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 10, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 31, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 31, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 9, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance