USPTO serial 78065728
BRAND WARFARE:10 RULES FOR BUILDING THE KILLER BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAND WARFARE:10 RULES FOR BUILDING THE KILLER BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Weinstein, Esq.
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY, HOAG & ELIOT LLPWORLD TRADE CTR W155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business consultation services in the field of brand marketing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by D'Alessandro, David F.
- Other trademarks owned by D'Alessandro, David F.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named BRAND WARFARE:10 RULES FOR BUILDING THE KILLER BRAND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |