USPTO serial 78065733
BRAND WARFARE:10 RULES FOR BUILDING THE KILLER BRAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BRAND WARFARE:10 RULES FOR BUILDING THE KILLER BRAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Weinstein, Esq.
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY HOAG LLPWORLD TRADE CTR W155 SEAPORT BLVDBOSTON, MA 02210-2600Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting courses, seminars and lectures in the field of brand marketing, and distributing course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by D'Alessandro, David F.
- Other trademarks owned by D'Alessandro, David F.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named BRAND WARFARE:10 RULES FOR BUILDING THE KILLER BRAND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 23, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |