Drawing for TLD INDEPENDENT

USPTO serial 78067072

TLD INDEPENDENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TLD INDEPENDENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042relational concept and marketing premises representing this agent, its systems and its commitment to the exploitation of global computer networks regardless of language, jurisdiction or the economics of a jurisdiction and, a licensed mark as an indicator that the licensee's goods and services, as component-parts of a global computer network, function in a manner that is of high standards of customer satisfaction, supply and performance in response-time, reliability and durability and that all ratings can be achieved regardless of the TLD component of a domain name and, as the single complement for a whole global computer network, that the licensee as the custodian of a specific TLD does in fact use the same high standards to manage its register, customer accounts, support systems, support hardware and its selection of affiliates including registrars and, as such, it may be prudent for a business to secure its domain name using multiple, different, TLDs as a form of long-term insurance should any issue threaten the utility of its on-line presence and that the business should rely on electronic catalogs, change of address notifications by way of its, to be discontinued, domain name or other means to inform its audiences of the "alternate" TLD (TLD-- Top-Level Domain, such as, country-code TLDs (ccTLD) such as dot FR, dot CA, dot MZ, dot BZ, dot BO, dot NZ and dot KZ, sponsored TLDs, independent TLDs and generic TLDs such as dot COM, dot NET and dot ORG)ACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 26, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance