USPTO serial 78068178
S.P.E.E.D.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, HEATHER
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with S.P.E.E.D.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | computerized database management in the fields of automotive design and fabrication, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer programming for others in the automotive, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery industries, updating of computer software for business purposes for others in the automotive, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery industries; design of computer software for business purposes for others in the fields of automotive design and fabrication, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery; rental of computer software for business purposes in the fields of automotive design and fabrication, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery; consultancy in the field of computer hardware for others in the automotive, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery industries, recovery of computer data for others in the automotive, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery industries; maintenance of business computer software in the automotive, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery industries; computer systems analysis for others in the automotive, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery industries; providing an on-line computer database for others in the field of software system development for the automotive, transportation, aerospace and defense, and plant manufacturing machinery industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Berner & Mattner Systemtechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks owned by Berner & Mattner Systemtechnik GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named S.P.E.E.D.
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 1, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 20, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 18, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |