USPTO serial 78068660
ECONORIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECONORIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Crystal River, FL
Crystal River, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | PAIR OF RETROFFITABLE, RIGID STEERING ARMS, WHICH WHEN INTERCONNECTED THROUGH A CENTER CONTROL COUPLING, IMPROVE BOTH RADIAL CURVING PERFORMANCE AND LATERAL STABILITY OF RAIL CAR TRUCKS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 23, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 27, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 28, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |