USPTO serial 78069296
EXTEND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EXTEND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MICRO FOCUS IP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
NEWBURY, BERKSHIRE, GB
Other trademarks owned by MICRO FOCUS IP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
ROCKVILLE, MD
MICRO FOCUS IP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
NEWBURY, BERKSHIRE, GB
Other trademarks owned by MICRO FOCUS IP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 Eighth Steet, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software development tools and the manuals supplied therewith | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 22, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO FOCUS IP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by Acucorp, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Acucorp, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Acucorp, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ACUCORP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO FOCUS (US), INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MICRO FOCUS IP DEVELOPMENT LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named EXTEND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 30, 2013 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 20, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 28, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 29, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 17, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 28, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 26, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |