Drawing for GIRLFRIENDS

USPTO serial 78069451

GIRLFRIENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIRLFRIENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Kremer

MARK KREMER CONKLE & OLESTEN3130 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 500SANTA MONICA, CA 90403UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Artificial eyelashes, adhesives for attaching artificial eyelashes, mascara, eye makeup, facial makeup, lipstick, hair dye, hair conditioners, shampoo, non-medicated hair care preparations, skin cream, skin lotion, body oil, skin soap, personal deodorants, perfume, cologne, depilatory creams, wax depilatories, shaving gel, artificial fingernails, nail polish, nail grooming products, namely tips, glue, lacquer, and glitterACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 5, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 15, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 25, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 25, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 25, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 25, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 14, 2006PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 13, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 7, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 5, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 9, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 2, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 29, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 16, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 26, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance