USPTO serial 78069657
BLYTHE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLYTHE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Pawtucket, RI
Pawtucket, RI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | cosmetics and toiletries, namely, soaps, cosmetic creams, eau de cologne; perfumes, eyebrow cosmetics, eyebrow pencils, cosmetic preparations for eyelashes, hair lotions, hair spray, makeup kits comprised of cosmetics, lipsticks, lotions for cosmetic purposes, make-up, make-up powder, make-up preparations, make-up removing preparations, mascara, beauty masks, medicated soap, skin cleansing milk for toilet purposes, nail care preparations, nail polish, nail varnish, essential oils for personal use, namely, oils for cosmetic purposes; essential oils for personal use, namely, oils for toilet purposes; cosmetic pencils, shampoos, cosmetic preparations for skin care, antiperspirant soap, cakes of soap, deodorant soap; sun-tanning preparations, namely, sun tan oil, sun tan gel and sun tan lotion; talcum powder for toilet use, toilet water, hand and body lotions, body balm, body mask, talcum powder, bath and shower gel, bath foam; antiperspirant deodorants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 7, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |