USPTO serial 78070911
MIRASOL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIRASOL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
James R. Saunders and Deborah A. Saunders partnership, The
Paso Robles, CA
Other trademarks owned by James R. Saunders and Deborah A. Saunders partnership, The
James R. Saunders and Deborah A. Saunders partnership, The
Paso Robles, CA
Other trademarks owned by James R. Saunders and Deborah A. Saunders partnership, The
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Wine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by James R. Saunders and Deborah A. Saunders partnership, The
- Other trademarks owned by James R. Saunders and Deborah A. Saunders partnership, The
- Other trademarks in Class 033
- Similar marks named MIRASOL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 1, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 21, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |