USPTO serial 78071477
VISUALLOCITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VISUALLOCITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adriana E. Kierszenbaum
JON A DORF DORF & KARLEN LLP740 W BOSTON POST RD STE 302MAMARONECK, NY 10543-3345UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE, NAMELY, DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE AND MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROM FOR USE IN ACCESSING AN ONLINE IMAGE ARCHIVE THAT MAY BE UPLOADED TO THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; VIDEO DISK FEATURING AN IMAGE ARCHIVE THAT MAY BE UPLOADED TO THE GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY PROVIDING A WEBSITE AT WHICH USERS CAN LINK TO AN ONLINE IMAGE ARCHIVE THAT MAY BE ACCESSED THROUGH A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AND BY PROVIDING HYPERLINKS TO THE WEBSITES OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
| 038 | ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF IMAGES AND PHOTOGRAPHS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK AS WELL AS THE STREAMING OF AUDIO MATERIAL ON THE INTERNET | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
| 039 | ELECTRONIC STORAGE OF AN ARCHIVE OF PHOTOGRAPHIC IMAGES | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
| 042 | HOSTING OF DIGITAL CONTENT, NAMELY, A PORTFOLIO OF PROPRIETARY IMAGES AND THE IMAGES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; PROVIDING CUSTOMIZED ONLINE WEB PAGES FEATURING USER-DEFINED INFORMATION, WHICH INCLUDES SEARCH ENGINES AND ONLINE WEB LINKS TO OTHER WEB SITES | ACTIVE | May 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VISUALLOCITY, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VISUALLOCITY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VISUALLOCITY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 12, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 3, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 30, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 4, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 12, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |