USPTO serial 78071708
IT'S A WUNDER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IT'S A WUNDER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Derel Monteith, Jr.
J DEREL MONTEITH JR CARTER & SCHNEDLER PAP O BOX 2985ASHEVILLE, NC 28802-2985UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | motor vehicles, namely, cars and automobiles | ACTIVE | Feb 22, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 2, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 5, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |