USPTO serial 78072530
SOMERLICIOUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SOMERLICIOUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Reed
DIANE M REED KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FRUIT TOPPING AND SAUCES; JAMS AND JELLIES; CHEESE FONDUE; FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES AND MEALS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, SEAFOOD, POULTRY, CHEESE, PROCESSED FRUIT AND/OR VEGETABLES; DAIRY-BASED CHOCOLATE FOOD BEVERAGES; PROTEIN BASED, NUTRIENT-DENSE SNACK BARS; SNACK DIP MIXES EXCLUDING SALSA AND OTHER SAUCES USED AS DIPS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | PASTA AND PASTA SAUCE; MOUSSES, CUSTARDS, AND PUDDINGS; ICE CREAM, ICE CREAM SUBSTITUTE, SOY-BASED ICE CREAM SUBSTITUTE, SORBET, ICE CANDY, FROZEN CONFECTIONS, FROZEN CUSTARDS AND FROZEN YOGURT; FLAVORED AND SWEETENED GELATINS; ICE CREAM TOPPINGS, NAMELY, CHOCOLATE CHUNKS, CHOCOLATE CHIPS, CHOCOLATE SYRUP, CHOCOLATE TOPPING, TOFFEE, CARAMEL AND SAUCES; DESSERT SAUCES; CHOCOLATE FONDUE; FROZEN, PREPARED AND PACKAGED ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF PASTA AND/OR RICE; NATURAL SWEETENER, EXCLUDING LACTOSE; CATSUP, BARBECUE SAUCE, TARTAR SAUCE, MARINADE, SALAD DRESSINGS, SEASONINGS, BAKE AND FRY COATING MIX, TACO SEASONINGS; CHILI SEASONINGS; PASTRIES; CHEESECAKE, CAKES; PIES, TARTS, COOKIES, CRACKERS, CANDY MINTS, CANDY, CHOCOLATES, CHEWING GUM; PROTEIN BREAD AND BUNS; BREAD AND BUNS; OATMEAL, GRAIN-BASED BREAKFAST CEREALS, PROTEIN CEREAL BASED SNACK FOODS, CEREAL PREPARATIONS; CHOCOLATE-BASED BEVERAGES AND COCOA NOT BEING DAIRY-BASED; HERB TEA AND TEA; INSTANT CAKES AND DESSERT MIXES; INSTANT ICE CREAM MIXES; AND INSTANT SHERBET MIXES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 15, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 1, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 19, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 14, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |