Drawing for SEARS. WHERE ELSE?

USPTO serial 78072636

SEARS. WHERE ELSE?

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLAYTON, CHERYL A
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEARS. WHERE ELSE??

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Amy Cohen Heller

ANDREA G HILBORN SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COLAW DEPT B6-377B3333 BEVERLY RDHOFFMAN ESTATES, IL 60179

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL DEPARTMENT STORESACTIVESep 9, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 28, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 28, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 20, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
May 4, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 21, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Nov 12, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Oct 29, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 29, 2002UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2002EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jul 15, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance