USPTO serial 78072682
OLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- PERKINS, KARLA M
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jesus Sanchelima
JESUS SANCHELIMA SANCHELIMA & ASSOCIATES PA235 S LE JEUNE RDMIAMI F 33134-1762,Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | bath and shower gel, shampoo, and baby cologne | ABANDONED | Feb 22, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 9, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 20, 2004 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |