USPTO serial 78073781
SECURITY & SAFETY CONSULTANTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECURITY & SAFETY CONSULTANTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodcliff Lake, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultation services to business, governmental, public service and other entities in the nature of assisting such entities to select appropriate architectural hardware and electronic access products, namely, automatic openers for swinging and sliding doors; automatic time switches-- door guards; door controllers; door and cabinet pulls; door condition monitoring consoles; door entrance sets; door escutcheons; door fasteners; door handle sets; door closers; door holders; door knobs and levers; door knockers; door push plates; door silencers; door stops; electrically operated audio and visual alarms, switches and door release devices; electromagnetic locks; electronic security equipment; exit door control devices; key operated switches; magnetic latch releases; metal door and window control devices; manually operated latches; manually operated locks; optical door viewers; latchsets; push button coded switches; push plates; rim locks; security bolts; solenoid operated bolts; window fasteners; window lifts and window locks, along with specification services for such hardware and electronic access products | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |