USPTO serial 78073828
BILINGUAL KIDS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2972602Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2005
- Examiner
- KON, ELISSA GARBER
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BILINGUAL KIDS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee B. Beitchman
LEE B BEITCHMAN BEITCHMAN & HUDSON215 14TH ST NWATLANTA, GA 30318-5303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | series of pre-recorded video tapes, digital video discs, audio cassettes and compact discs intended to teach foreign languages to infants and children | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 28, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 31, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 11, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |