USPTO serial 78074485
TANZAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TANZAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ronkonkoma, NY
Ronkonkoma, NY
EAST MORICHES, NY
East Moriches, NY
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment in the nature of baseball games; Entertainment in the nature of basketball games; Entertainment in the nature of martial arts games; Entertainment in the nature of football games; Entertainment in the nature of hockey games; Entertainment in the nature of soccer games; Entertainment in the nature of online computer games | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tanzan.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Tanzan.com, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MR. SEAN JAROMY
- Other trademarks owned by CHIPMINER CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named TANZAN
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jun 18, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 21, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |