USPTO serial 78074522
E-MOTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CAIN, CATHERINE P
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with E-MOTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Laguna Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in creating, deploying and monitoring electronic messages and stand-alone text, data, video, interactive media and audio files | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2001 |
| 038 | Computer services to effect the transmission of text, data and graphic information, in electronic messages and stand-alone text, data, video, audio and interactive media files | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2001 |
| 042 | services in the field of monitoring, analyzing and reporting on the content of electronic messages and stand-alone text, data, video, interactive media and audio files | INACTIVE - INSUFFICIENT FEE RECEIVED | Feb 2, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 25, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |