USPTO serial 78074530
AIRLINE TRAVEL BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 17, 2005
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AIRLINE TRAVEL BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MADISON, WI
Sixel, Boggs and Associates, Inc.
Eugene, OR
BOGGS AVIATION ASSOCIATES, INC.
EUGENE, OR
BOGGS AVIATION ASSOCIATES, INC.
EUGENE, OR
BOGGS AVIATION ASSOCIATES, INC.
EUGENE, OR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan D. Pitchford
Susan D. Pitchford Chernoff Vilhauer McClung & Stenzel LLP601 SW 2nd Ave., Suite 1600Portland, OR 97204UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS NETWORKING SERVICES, NAMELY ESTABLISHING BUSINESS RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN COMMERCIAL AIRLINES, AIRPORTS, AND COMMUNITIES SURROUNDING THE AIRPORTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 12, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MEAD & HUNT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Sixel, Boggs and Associates, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by BOGGS AVIATION ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOGGS AVIATION ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BOGGS AVIATION ASSOCIATES, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named AIRLINE TRAVEL BANK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Apr 2, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 2, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 7, 2011 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Dec 6, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 16, 2011 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 17, 2005 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Feb 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | CNSR | ALLOWED SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2003 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |