USPTO serial 78074574
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L Baker Baker and Rannells PA575 Route 28Suite 102Raritan, NJ 08869| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer hardware and software; computer software relating to telecommunications and the internet; internet platform software; provision of information on-line or from computer databases in relation to services information directory services; provision of information relating to IT, computer hardware and computer software; computer software business directory services; provision of information on-line relating to IT, computer hardware and computer software; maintenance of computer software and all other related goods and services.; Computer hardware and software; computer software relating to telecommunications and the internet; internet platform software; provision of information on-line or from computer databases in relation to services information directory services; provision of information relating to IT, computer hardware and computer software; computer software business directory services; provision of information on-line relating to IT, computer hardware and computer software; maintenance of computer software and all other related goods and services. | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 8, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |