Drawing for AMERICREST

USPTO serial 78074607

AMERICREST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LE, KHANH M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMERICREST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KARIN E PETERKA

KARIN E PETERKA BUCHALTER NEMER1000 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1500LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-2457UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Commercial and consumer banking, estate trust management, lending, funds investment; Commercial and consumer financial services, namely, investment securitiesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 16, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 9, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Jan 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 20, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Sep 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 30, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Aug 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Sep 5, 2002OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 18, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 14, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance