CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for ECW

USPTO serial 78074974

ECW

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3282316Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 21, 2007
Examiner
FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with ECW?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen

WORLD WRESTLING ENTERTAINMENT, INC.1241 EAST MAIN STREETSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Full line of clothing, headgear [ and footwear ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 9, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 30, 2019C8.TCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)—
Sep 22, 2017PR89POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9—
Sep 21, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2013C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 3, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 15, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Aug 15, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Aug 15, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 21, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 5, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 16, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 9, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 6, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 2, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 2, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 2, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 26, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 26, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 29, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 29, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 29, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 29, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 9, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 9, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 29, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 27, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2004RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 30, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 21, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 12, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 9, 2002GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance