USPTO serial 78075102
STRAY SHEEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DWYER, SEAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STRAY SHEEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
LOS ANGELES, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PLAYER-OPERATED ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR ELECTRONIC VIDEO GAME MACHINES, COMPUTER GAME SOFTWARE, COMPUTER GAME TAPES AND CARTRIDGES; VIDEO GAME SOFTWARE, COMPUTER GAMES CONTAINING MEMORY DEVICES, NAMELY, DISKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GAMES AND PLAYTHINGS, NAMELY, PLAY SETS, PUZZLES, ON-LINE GAMES, STUFFED ANIMALS, AND DRESS UP TOYS; ELECTRONIC GAME EQUIPMENT, NAMELY HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC VIDEO GAMES, TOY LIGHT GUNS INTERACTIVE WITH A VIDEO DISPLAY, ELECTRONIC EXERCISE MATS INTERACTIVE WITH A VIDEO GAME DISPLAY, AND ELECTRONIC GAME EQUIPMENT WITH A WATCH/CLOCK FUNCTION, NAMELY VIRTUAL PETS; SPORTING GOODS, NAMELY, BASKETBALLS, SOFTBALL, BATS, BASEBALL AND SOFTBALL MITTS, SOCCER BALLS, VOLLEYBALLS, FOOTBALLS, KICK BALLS; ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR, NAMELY CLOTHING, JEWELRY, POUCHES, BAGS, AND VEHICLES; CHILD'S MULTIPLE ACTIVITY TOYS; DOLLS; SOFT SCULPTURE DOLLS; AND TOY FIGURES, TOY CARS, TOY MODEL HOBBY CRAFT KITS COMPRISING TOY BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES, ANIMALS, AND VEHICLES, CARD GAMES AND PRINTED INSTRUCTIONS SOLD THEREWITH; PLUSH TOYS, BOARD GAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Mixx Entertainment Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TOKYOPOP INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TOKYOPOP INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named STRAY SHEEP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 11, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |