USPTO serial 78075432
CLARK SYNTHESIS TACTILE SOUND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2917169Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 11, 2005
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLARK SYNTHESIS TACTILE SOUND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian D. Smith,
BRIAN D. SMITH1125 SEVENTEENTH ST STE 600DENVER, CO 80202-2052UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TRANSDUCERS AND SPEAKERS, NAMELY, ELECTRO-MECHANICAL DEVICES DESIGNED TO PRODUCE SYNCHRONOUS SENSATORY AND AUDIO SIGNALS WHEN ATTACHED TO PHYSICAL ARTICLES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Clark Synthesis Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Clark Synthesis Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Clark Synthesis Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named CLARK SYNTHESIS TACTILE SOUND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 10, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 31, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 19, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 29, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |