USPTO serial 78075525
WEBFOCUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WEBFOCUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Petersburgh, FL
St. Petersburgh, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Oliver E. Todd, Jr.
OLIVER E TODD JR MACMILLAN, SOBANSKI & TODD LLC1 MARITIME PLZ FL 4TOLEDO, OH 43604-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | feature of a computer software program, namely, a computer software feature for use by learning disabled and easily distracted computer users for de-emphasizing all portions of information displayed on a computer monitor, except for the relevant element, from a global communications network; a feature of a computer software program, namely, a computer software feature for use by learning disabled and easily distracted computer users for de-emphasizing all portions of information, except for the relevant element, from a global communications network presented in a bi-modal manner where the relevant information is both visually displayed on a computer monitor and simultaneously audibly presented | ABANDONED | Oct 31, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2001 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |