USPTO serial 78075542
ACE IMAGING SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2609947Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ACE IMAGING SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Randolph E. Digges, III
Randolph E. Digges, III Rankin, Hill & Clark LLP23755 Lorain Road, Suite 200North Olmsted, OH 44070UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Leasing of office equipment; retail store services in the field of office equipment featuring printers, scanners, digital and analog photocopy machines, and related parts and supplies | EXPIRED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by American Copy Equipment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Copy Equipment, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by American Copy Equipment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named ACE IMAGING SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 9, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 17, 2007 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2007 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 7, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 7, 2004 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 11, 2003 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 16, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |