USPTO serial 78075611
EPHOTOGRAPHY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 23, 2004
- Examiner
- BECK, LORETTA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EPHOTOGRAPHY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
Santa Cruz, CA
Other trademarks owned by Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
Santa Cruz, CA
Other trademarks owned by Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
Santa Cruz, CA
Other trademarks owned by Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERNEST V. LINEK, ESQ.
ERNEST V. LINEK, ESQ. BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.SUITE 180028 STATE STREETBOSTON, MA 02109-1701Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ELECTRONIC ONLINE PUBLICATION, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, FEATURING INFORMATION ON PRODUCTS AND SERVICES IN THE PHOTOGRAPHY INDUSTRY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 10, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
- Other trademarks owned by Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
- Other trademarks owned by Ephotography, LLC Single Member Nagaraj, Annamalai
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EPHOTOGRAPHY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 3, 2009 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 26, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |