USPTO serial 78076156
GD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOYNER, CHARLES G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Augustin de Desmaures, CA
Saint-Augustin de Desmaures, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 S80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRONIC CONTROLLERS FOR CONTROLLING, MANAGING AND AUTOMATING ELECTRIC POWER CONSUMPTION OF ELECTRICAL DEVICES, LIGHTING, HEATERS, AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEMS; SECURITY AND ALARM SYSTEMS; DRIVING COMMUNICATING MODULES, INFRARED BEAMS INVISIBLE TO THE NAKED EYE, INAUDIBLE RADIO FREQUENCY WAVES AND LIGHT PULSES CHANNELED THROUGH SPECIALIZED GLASS WIRES KNOWN AS OPTIC FIBERS; MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE FOR HOME AUTOMATION APPLICATION AND DEVICES, MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE WITH INTERACTIVE AND COMMUNICATION CAPABILITY FOR INTERACTING, READING DATA, CONTROLLING AND MANAGING MANAGEMENT OF HOME AUTOMATED SYSTEMS, DOMESTIC SURVEILLANCE, TEMPERATURE CONTROLLERS, HUMIDITY CONTROLLERS, COMPUTER SYSTEMS, CAMERAS, MOTION DETECTORS AND SECURITY ALARMS, PC/WEB INTERFACE FOR SUPPORTING THE ABOVE APPLICATION AND DEVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 11, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |