USPTO serial 78076629
TECHNOLOGY FOR HUMAN VISION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TECHNOLOGY FOR HUMAN VISION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
Sebastopol, CA
ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
Sebastopol, CA
ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
Sebastopol, CA
GYEONGGI-DO, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jennifer M. Lantz
Jennifer M. Lantz MacPherson Kwok Chen & Heid LLP2033 Gateway PlaceSuite 400San Jose, CA 95110Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Liquid crystals display screens; semiconductor control chip for controlling liquid crystal display screens; computer software for enabling liquid crystal display screen display; computer software for creating images for display on liquid crystal display screen; data compression software; and hardware and software for electronic imaging, namely, for generating, storing, transmitting and manipulating of graphic images, both natural images such as photographic stills and motion pictures, and computer generated images, namely, text, icons, animation, and the like, for computer displays screens, projectors, televisions, cameras, cell phones, and other portable electronic equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ClairVoyante Laboratories, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named TECHNOLOGY FOR HUMAN VISION
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 12, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 12, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 19, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 28, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |