Drawing for TROPICAL ESCAPE

USPTO serial 78077135

TROPICAL ESCAPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLANDU, FLORENTINA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TROPICAL ESCAPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, HAND AND BODY SOAP IN BAR AND LIQUID FORM, BODY WASH, HAND AND BODY LOTIONS AND MOISTURIZERS, BODY SCRUBS, EXFOLIATERS, FACIAL CLEANSERS, FACIAL CLEANSING WIPES, BODY DEODORANTS AND ANTIPIRSPIRANTS, AND BODY SPRAYSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 11, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 1, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 1, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 29, 2003EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 1, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 3, 2003CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 31, 2002CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Dec 2, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 2, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 20, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Nov 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance