USPTO serial 78077480
A NEW DAWN IN HEALTHY NUTRITION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 1, 2006
- Examiner
- BELLO, ZACK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with A NEW DAWN IN HEALTHY NUTRITION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $1,700
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NEW CANAN, CT
Carpinteria, CA
CARPINTERIA, CA
Carpinteria, CA
OBERWIL LIELI, CH
San Mateo, CA
Luxembourg, LU
Luxembourg, LU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. MacDermott
Michael J. MacDermott Lewis Roca Rothgerber Christie LLPP.O. Box 29001Glendale, CA 91209-9001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | FOOD SUPPLEMENTS | ACTIVE | Dec 5, 2005 |
| 032 | BEVERAGES, NAMELY, [ ISOTONIC DRINKS, HYPERTONIC DRINKS, HYPOTONIC DRINKS, ] FRUIT DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS, [ ISOTONIC ENERGY DRINKS ] AND SPORTS DRINKS; FRUIT-FLAVORED SOFT DRINKS, SOFT DRINKS; POWDERS AND CONCENTRATES USED IN THE PREPARATION OF THE FOREGOING BEVERAGES | ACTIVE | Oct 30, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FRS TECHNOLOGIES LLC
- Other trademarks owned by New Sun Nutrition LLC
- Other trademarks owned by NEW SUN NUTRITION, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by New Sun Nutrition LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FRS INTERNATIONAL AG
- Other trademarks owned by THE FRS COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Red Devil International S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by Red Devil International S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named A NEW DAWN IN HEALTHY NUTRITION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2019 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 13, 2019 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 29, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 1, 2015 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2012 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 17, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 30, 2012 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 30, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 3, 2006 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 31, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2006 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 24, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 1, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |