USPTO serial 78077508
Serial No. 78077508
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 78077508?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | company letterhead and business cards return address labels and as a logo on all video production credits and as the company logo an packaging of any videotapes and multimedia products | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 22, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 11, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 24, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 6, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |