USPTO serial 78077632
BOB'S BURGERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BOB'S BURGERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Albuquerque, NM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kermit D. Lopez
KERMIT D LOPEZ ORTIZ & LOPEZ, PLLCPO BOX 4484ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87196-4484UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services featuring New Mexico red-chile and green-chile fast food products, including taco burgers, ranchero burgers, namely, red-chile and/or green-chile based burgers, red-chile burgers, green chile burgers, rolled taquitos, frito pie, and chile cheese fries containing red or green chile | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 26, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |