Drawing for BOB'S BURGERS

USPTO serial 78077632

BOB'S BURGERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOB'S BURGERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kermit D. Lopez

KERMIT D LOPEZ ORTIZ & LOPEZ, PLLCPO BOX 4484ALBUQUERQUE, NM 87196-4484UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant services featuring New Mexico red-chile and green-chile fast food products, including taco burgers, ranchero burgers, namely, red-chile and/or green-chile based burgers, red-chile burgers, green chile burgers, rolled taquitos, frito pie, and chile cheese fries containing red or green chileACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 26, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jan 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 18, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 31, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 30, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 24, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance