USPTO serial 78077924
INTUITIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INTUITIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Neustadt/Wied, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Champagne
THOMAS M CHAMPAGNE IP STRATEGIES, PC806 7TH ST NWSTE 301WASHINGTON, DC 20001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for database management; computer software for workflow management; computer software for archiving and document management; computer software for electronic data processing of structured and unstructured information for purposes of recognition, classification, and retrieval, as well as intelligent content identification and matching; computer software for automatically responding to incoming electronic mail; computer software for knowledge management and expert systems.; Computer software for database management; computer software for workflow management; computer software for archiving and document management; computer software for electronic data processing of structured and unstructured information for purposes of recognition, classification, and retrieval, as well as intelligent content identification and matching; computer software for automatically responding to incoming electronic mail; computer software for knowledge management and expert systems. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2002 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 26, 2001 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |