USPTO serial 78078459
EMERSON. CONSIDER IT SOLVED.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3159656Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 17, 2006
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EMERSON. CONSIDER IT SOLVED.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa M. DuRoss
LISA M DUROSS HARNESS, DICKEY & PIERCE PLCPO BOX 828BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48303-0828UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Transportation of goods by land vehicles and transportation of people by air | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 25, 2006 |
| 042 | Laboratory analysis services pertaining to industrial and commercial equipment, machinery and processes; consultation services in the nature of engineering services in the field of tribology; designing communications antennas and equipment relating thereto | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 28, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Emerson Electric Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named EMERSON. CONSIDER IT SOLVED.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 24, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 30, 2008 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 2007 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 17, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 25, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 13, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 29, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |