USPTO serial 78078585
U.S. WOMEN'S CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2887973Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 21, 2004
- Examiner
- BALDWIN, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with U.S. WOMEN'S CHAMBER OF COMMERCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Phoenix, AZ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK HARRISON
MARK HARRISON VENABLE LLPPO BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-4385UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | ASSOCIATION SERVICES, NAMELY PROMOTING THE ECONOMIC AND LEADERSHIP GROWTH OF WOMEN IN BUSINESS IN THE UNITED STATES AND INTERNATIONALLY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 10, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dorfman, Margot Lynne
- Other trademarks owned by Williams, Terry Lynn
- Other trademarks owned by Williams, Terry Lynn
- Other trademarks owned by Dorfman, Margot Lynne
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named U.S. WOMEN'S CHAMBER OF COMMERCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 15, 2013 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 3, 2011 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 2, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 29, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2010 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 30, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 11, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2004 | GRDA | WITHDRAWAL OF REFUSAL DURING APPEAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2004 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2004 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 13, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |